SilverFoxJams 2016-04-18 13:40:00

Yes, that is quite true. It's interesting that you point it out.

My dad just mentioned to me that D.C. was designed by the illuminati and the free masons. Hmmm, I'll have to look into that later.

SilverFoxJams 2016-04-18 16:24:06

I already knew about the owl on the dollar, but I didn't know about the other owl! I'll look up who the architect designer was... Pierre Charles L'Enfant - ahh, a French guy! Initiated as a freemason after the Revolutionary War...

Just saw the picture of the owl in the D.C. design. Interesting!

SilverFoxJams 2016-04-18 21:58:33 (Updated 2016-04-19 19:43:16)

Umm, I'll need to study further about the numbers. (Where are you getting those numbers from? What version of the Bible are you on about? King James, or Koni - which is standard cerulean Greek?)

I do know that there are major gaps in the Bible. The books Enoch and Jubilee were removed. My dad has taken several courses on the history of religion.

Jubilee is about the sons and daughters of Adam and Eve. Enoch is about the 200 Watchers who were left behind to watch mankind.

SilverFoxJams 2016-04-19 20:01:25 (Updated 2016-04-19 20:35:30)

Thanks for linking me to the site.

Numbers are adjectives. 3, 6, and 9 are adjectives. 3 what? 6 what? 9 what?

Numbers are a language of basic patterns. You have listed many interesting conjectures, but they seem to come from Tesla. What have you figured out from what you learned from Tesla?

Calculation or one dialect of mathematics? Stacking numbers, like 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 are a different dialect. 1+1 does not equal 2. They're two different languages. 1 + 1 = 3 - 1, or 4 - 2, 0r 5 - 3. They are calculations. The only thing you can do with numbers is multiply, divide, add, and subtract.

In your sequencing, you jumped from dialect to dialect without any proof, or transition. I know *you* understand the logic of what you're saying, but I don't. There's not enough transition from dialect to dialect. It's been a long time since I met a good mathematician. All great philosophers, example Bertrand Russell, in his work "The Principles of Numbers" goes into great detail of how to transfer from one mathematical dialect into another.

You are skipping very important steps in your work. It might not be necessary for you, to show all the work, but who can follow you if you constantly run into the woods? Can't follow it.

All great philosophers are great mathematicians, and not all great mathematicians are great philosophers. Where do you lie?

Remember Copernicus had great mathematical formulas on how everything revolved around the Earth, but his supposition that we were the center of the universe was very, very wrong. That's what happens when you don't translate from one math dialect to another. You get formulas where the numbers were, but the logic is faulty. Check your work.

SilverFoxJams 2016-04-19 20:45:39 (Updated 2016-04-19 21:27:31)

You won't answer questions, because the answers cause your number babble to fall apart. It's a shame that someone with mathematical talent that you obviously possess is so closed minded.

The sign of a psychotic mind is the inability to question their own logic. In some of your number sequences, you list irrational number. Example, Pi. The only reason why that is an irrational number is because the Greeks didn't have the concept of zero. Therefore, they can't measure accurately anything. That's why in some cases, fractions are of better use than decimals.

You're not the only person who has studied Tesla's work. Unless you have the government's files, you don't know how far he had gone in his mathematical computations.

My dad's tutor was Einstein and Bertrand Russell. They had a sense of humor, and wonder they understand what is known, what is unknown, and what is unknowable. Do you?

My dad was interested in your ability to understand 9 as the end of a single digit counting system. In computer talk, lol, that would be 00, 0 0, 0 1, 0 2, all the way up to 0 9. How much money and research has been unable to be verified by counting one through ten has dis-causes, ghosts, to show up in intricate computations. I believe you know this. You may be the smartest tadpole in the puddle you live in, but tadpoles aren't the top of the evolutionary chain.

Freemasons were in existence 200 years before the King James version of the Bible. They built a lot of magnificent cathedrals. Their importance to the early medieval Catholic Church is obvious, but the Greek Bible does not contain the mathematical pinnings that you desire as a foundation to launch your pedagog. If I were you, I wouldn't worry so much about left brain or right brain, but on the connective tissue of the callous callorum (spelling might be wrong). The ability to understand what you seek can be found there!

SilverFoxJams 2016-04-19 21:30:47 (Updated 2016-04-19 22:26:29)

How do YOU know without testing scientifically what brain side is dominant? lol It's a sign of your arrogance, that when you can't explain something, you go to the rational lie and rationalize why no one can understand except you.

How many dialects of mathematics are you familiar with? What is your education in mathematics? Parroting other people's theories is not a sign of a healthy mind. The foundation of your mathematical theories consist of sayings like, "Everything that is perpendicular is perpendicular!" Your attachment to 360 circles could just as easily be 360 degrees squares.

Does your use of sacred circles have any relativity to the organizing of the cell? I haven't seen the link. There is no one form of cancer, but YOU have found THE cure. As Forrest Gump says, "Stupid is as stupid does." I'm not here to impress or depress your being. If you can't explain your theories to a child so that *they* can understand, there is something wrong with your theories. For instance, you call your theories scientific proofs undisputable!

So when does that book come out, on undisputable truths? How big is the reference to other people's works going to be? I have a hunch it will be the whole book, because you don't seem capable of transferring axioms from theories to proofs.

There is more to thinking than abstract mathematical constructs. Language is the ultimate form of mathematical communication. Of course, to someone who can't see that they are dressed in the emperor's new clothes wouldn't see that.

Odd numbers, even numbers, prime numbers, consonants, vowels, and vowlettes or semi-vowels have more in common than you realize.

The Bible in the English language you were using to lay a foundation of your theories is false. The Greek verses don't add up to the same numbers as your English construct. Oh, and by the way, Greek is read from right to left. So the counting would be cerulean also.

That's the problem with you Bible coders. You're looking for things that aren't there, so you have to make them there. What a waste of intellectual energy.

Left brain VS right brain psychology is the current fad, but not scientific proof. Modern psychology looks at the brain the crown of creation, and the heart is only a pump. That's your kind of thinking. You'll never understand that is the spiritus contra spiritum. You left brain people will always be left behind, lol.

The cross is the symbol of dividing the universe into active and passive forces. When the Mayans told that to the Spanish invaders, they were killed. "If you don't believe what I believe, you are stupid. My God can beat your God up! Nyah-nyah-nyanny poo poo!" I'm sure everything you needed to know you learned in kindergarten, but it's time to re-kindergarten. Put on your big boy pants, and come out of the shadows, and face the music of the spears.

So, who were your math teachers? My dad's was Einstein, and Bertrand Russell. They didn't care what side of the brain was dominant. Only if you could learn the abstract element of higher math.

I'm not calling you dumb. Only dull.

https://www.facebook.com/light.from.the.netherworld I'm putting you and that guy Jesse Lightning up for the Darwin Award!

SilverFoxJams 2016-04-19 22:50:30

Thanks for the info.